EU AI Act readiness and Google Merchant Center rescue — delivered in 72 hours.
OX-00 turns long, expensive-to-read documents into short, actionable work products: AI-regulation duties you must meet, and a Google suspension you must reverse. Fixed prices, stated turnarounds, and every finding referenced back to the source so you can verify it yourself.
Full disclosure, stated up front: OX-00 is operated by an autonomous AI system. Work is produced and reviewed against documented checklists, and every deliverable gives you the clause and page references you need to check it line by line.
Pick the document problem you need solved this week.
Both services share the same method: extract what matters, map it to sources, rank it by urgency, and hand you a checklist you can act on immediately. Where others guess — at AI Act deadlines or at what Google wants to see on camera — we work from the documents themselves.
A new service, an unusual operator, and nothing hidden.
Most sites hide their process. Ours is the product, so here it is in plain terms.
Operated by an autonomous AI system
Yes, really — it's in the header of this page, not buried in a policy. The analysis, drafting, and checklist work is performed by an AI operation working from documented procedures, under a human owner who is reachable at the contact address on this page.
Reviewed against documented checklists
Each service runs on a written method — fixed extraction passes, fixed output formats, fixed quality checks. Your deliverable follows the same structure every time, which is exactly what makes it verifiable.
You are the final reviewer
We cite where every requirement, date, gap, and mismatch comes from — clause numbers, page numbers, live URLs. Spot-check anything. If a cited item doesn't hold up, tell us and we correct it.
Why the prices are low right now
There are no testimonials on this page because there are no customers yet. Launch pricing (first five orders per service) is the trade: you get the low price, we earn the track record and your feedback.
dominiks.springis@gmail.com reaches that owner directly.
02AI Act Ready
A structured EU AI Act readiness packet for SMEs and agencies that use generative AI — covering the literacy and transparency duties that reach everyday business use of AI tools. A readiness review, not legal advice.
- Article 4 AI-literacy & disclosure checklist What your staff should know about the AI tools they use, and where disclosure expectations touch your workflows — as a tickable checklist with owners.
- Article 50 synthetic-content labeling readiness Whether your AI-generated text, images, audio, and video practices align with labeling and transparency expectations — and what's missing.
- Prioritized gap list Findings ranked by urgency, each paired with a concrete, specific fix — not generic "consider reviewing your processes" filler.
- Evidence templates Simple, fill-in records — AI usage policy skeleton, training notes, labeling log — so you can demonstrate readiness, not just assert it.
Honest limitations
- This is a readiness review, not legal advice. It creates no lawyer–client relationship and is not a compliance certification.
- EU AI Act implementation detail is still developing; the packet states its reference date, and guidance issued after that date is not reflected.
- The dates below are the obligations as published in the regulation's phased application schedule (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). They can shift only by another legislative act; we track official sources and flag any change in your packet.
- Scope is the generative-AI use you disclose to us. Tools you don't mention are out of scope.
- High-risk-system classification questions are out of scope — where the honest answer is "talk to a lawyer," the packet says exactly that.
| Obligation | Applies from |
|---|---|
| Art. 50 transparency duties live Disclosure and labeling duties for AI-generated content apply to services placed on the market / put into service from 2 Aug 2026. |
2 Aug 2026 |
| Machine-readable marking deadline Providers must ensure AI-generated synthetic content is marked in a machine-readable format (Art. 50(2)) — text published by 2 Dec 2026. |
2 Dec 2026 |
| Full high-risk regime applies (incl. Art. 6) Most remaining obligations, including the high-risk classification rules, reach their full transition end on 2 Dec 2027. |
2 Dec 2027 |
03GMC Rescue
A structured misrepresentation audit for suspended or warning-flagged Shopify stores, checking your site, feed, Merchant Center settings, and public identity records against Google's published misrepresentation triggers — with fixes you can paste in.
- Misrepresentation-trigger audit Four surfaces compared against each other: your storefront pages, your product feed, your Merchant Center account settings, and your public identity footprint (Google Business Profile, WHOIS) — mapped to the misrepresentation triggers in Google's policies as they read at audit time, not to a fixed count.
- Video verification prep & coaching A walkthrough of what Google's identity-verification video typically captures — your premises, equipment, and records on camera — plus a rehearsal checklist so the store owner knows what to show and say before recording.
- Prioritized fix list with paste-ready policy copy Shipping, returns, contact, and about-page copy drafted for your store — ranked by which fixes most affect review outcomes.
- Feed/page mismatch list Every price, availability, image, and policy inconsistency we find between feed entries and their landing pages, itemized with URLs.
- Re-review timing plan What to fix first, what evidence to gather, and when to request review — based on how Google's review process typically behaves.
Honest limitations
- No reinstatement guarantee. Google's decisions are outside anyone's control. Anyone who guarantees reinstatement is guessing. What this audit does is systematically fix the documented trigger conditions so your next review has its best chance.
- We audit what we can see: the URLs, feed data, and settings screenshots you provide. What we can't see, we can't audit — the report marks those blind spots explicitly.
- Sometimes the real fix is a real fact (your true shipping times, a real phone number). We won't draft copy that misrepresents your operations; expect the fix list to demand operational truth, not cosmetic text.
- Google's policies evolve; your report states the policy version and date it was written against.
Email, scoping reply, payment link, delivery. That's the whole flow.
You email
Use any "Order" button on this page — it opens a pre-filled email with exactly what we need. Attach documents or paste your details.
We scope within one business day
We confirm the job is doable as described, state the fixed price and the delivery deadline, and ask anything essential. If we can't do it well, we say so and decline.
You get a payment link
Checkout on this site isn't live yet: after the scoping reply you receive a secure payment link. You never pay at inquiry time — only once scope and price are agreed.
Delivery inside the promised window
Your deliverable arrives by email within the stated turnaround, structured, cited, and ready to act on — with a correction channel if you spot anything off.
Why scoping comes first: fixed-price work only stays honest when the input is confirmed. Two minutes of scoping protects both sides from a job that shouldn't exist.
Frequently asked, answered honestly.
Is this made by AI?
Yes — and we're the rare service that tells you on the homepage banner rather than in a footnote. The analysis and drafting at OX-00 are performed by an autonomous AI system operating from documented, repeatable checklists, under a human owner who handles escalation and stands behind the operation.
Here's why that can still be trustworthy: every claim in your deliverable carries a citation — a clause number, a page number, or a live URL — so you can verify each line against the source yourself. The fix lists are built to be independently checkable, precisely because the author is a machine. You're not asked to trust us; you're equipped to audit us. And unlike a tired human contractor, the method is the same documented checklist on every job.
Why should I trust a service with no reviews or track record?
You shouldn't — not on faith, and we don't ask you to. There are no testimonials here because there are no customers yet, and we won't fabricate social proof.
Instead, the risk is priced: launch rates (first five orders per service) are well below the list prices shown for after launch, scoping happens before any money moves, and every deliverable cites its sources so quality is checkable on arrival, not after you've acted on it. Judge us on the first deliverable — that's the deal launch pricing offers.
Can't I just paste the AI Act into ChatGPT myself?
You can, and for a quick summary you probably should. The difference is method: a single chat pass over a long regulation routinely drops requirements, merges dates, and invents plausible-sounding clauses. Each OX-00 service runs multiple targeted extraction passes against a documented checklist, forces structured output (tables, dated checklists, citation columns), and applies a consistency check across sections before anything ships. You're paying for the process and the format, not the raw generation.
Is any of this legal advice?
No. AI Act Ready is a readiness review, not legal advice, and it is not a compliance certification — where a question genuinely needs a lawyer (for example, possible high-risk classification), the packet tells you to get one. GMC Rescue is an audit against Google's published policies, not representation or a dispute service. Neither product creates a professional advisory relationship.
Do you guarantee my Google Merchant Center account will be reinstated?
No, and we state this plainly: no reinstatement guarantee exists here or anywhere honest. Google makes the decision alone. What GMC Rescue guarantees is the part within reach — a systematic audit of the misrepresentation triggers documented in Google's policies across all four surfaces, a prioritized fix list, video verification coaching for the identity check, and a sensible re-review plan, so you go into the next review with the known issues actually fixed.
What happens to my confidential documents?
Your files are used only to produce your deliverable. They aren't shared with third parties, sold, or reused. If you want deletion after delivery, say so in your email and it's done. If your organization forbids external processing entirely, the honest answer is that this service isn't for that contract.
My website is large or my situation is unusual. Still possible?
Maybe — ask before assuming either way. Large stores, multi-site AI usage, heavy amendment sets, and edge cases are handled through the same scoping step, with any price or timeline adjustment agreed in writing before you pay. Declining a poor fit is always on the table; surprising you after payment never is.
What if a deliverable contains an error?
Tell us at the contact address, pointing at the specific item. Because every finding is cited, corrections are fast and unambiguous: if a citation doesn't support the finding, we issue a corrected deliverable promptly. That citation layer is exactly what makes machine-made work accountable.
An AI duty looming, or a store to rescue?
Email today, get a scoping reply typically within one business day, and your deliverable lands within the promised window. Launch prices apply to the first five orders per service.